Hillary is a flawed candidate, like most of them. But Trump has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is not qualified to become president.
There’s no nuance here. Trump is a sociopathic liar. Just look at his recorded lies compared to Clinton, who ranked among the most honest politicians during the primaries:
Trump: 71% F, 14% T (Holy crap, this guy really is the best at something!)
Clinton: 29% F, 50% T (The only lie ratings smaller than Hillary are those by Presidents Obama and Clinton; conservatives, insert joke here)
Sanders: 27% F, 52% T (the only candidate not to tell a pants on fire lie; maybe it’s because he only owns two suits)
I wish people would be honest and say “I wanted Sanders to win so badly that I’m heartbroken and giving up on politics.” I wouldn’t agree with the thought process, but at least I could appreciate your feelings. But please, stop with the false equivalencies.
Nuanced thinking would be, where on the scale of good and evil do these candidates fall? And once you establish Trump’s position (somewhere in the space occupied by Barry Goldwater and George Wallace), then figure out where Clinton would be (IMO, more Obama with fewer good speeches). They are just not the same.